Subscribe by Release via RSS 2.0Subscribe by Chronology via RSS 2.0Recent Comments via RSS 2.0

For The Press - A Project Summary

Nov
14

We’ve found through this process of assembling the animatic that our original ideas and intentions don’t necessary carry over to the screen as much as we had hoped. One element, a line that Anna hears over and over again in her head through the book: “What do you see?” was cut tonight after a pretty big discussion between Adrian and I. It pained me.

In the novel, there is a big through-line of Anna hearing her father’s voice as she is exposed to and experiences more of the D’ni environment. It’s a question that Anna was introduced to at a very young age (it is implied) and serves as a device to explain how she developed the curiosity and inner-scientist that her character necessitates.

Adrian and I always felt that this through-line was a poorly developed consolation for the fact that the novel lacked a more enriched definition of Anna and her father’s relationship - a relationship that’s pretty much been fully rewritten for the film adaptation. But, I wanted this one element that appears throughout the novel to stay - if for nothing else than to keep alive the connection to something that holds a pretty strong foot hold in lore and resonates with the fans. (In The Book of Atrus, it’s clear that Atrus is also familiar with this phrase, as his grandmother - Anna - passes it along to him).

In the end, I conceded. In reality, the phrase itself didn’t hold a lot of power in the context of the trailer and using it as the opening line (which I fought for incessantly) slowed down the first few seconds and only made sense if you were attached to sentiment from the novel itself. In other words, it did not fit for a general audience.

We’ve found that a lot of things are going to have to be restructured to really have an impact on a general audience, and we’re finding it to be a challenge to not start rewrites (and consequently have Phil develop even more boards based on those rewrites) right away. Sections of the trailer already are too close to Cyan lore and more of a homage than an effective introduction to the story. It’s a hard to find the balance of just enough to let Cyan know we’re staying true while not boring investors and future production staff to tears. This is not for the fans, and we keep on having to remind ourselves of that.

It’s strange when we take breaks from working from time to time. Since we’re living and breathing Myst right now, we can’t help but hit the forums and read through the latest news and quips. A couple of discussions have broken out recently about a movie again - and we so badly want to comment but know that we can’t. We wonder what everyone would say if they knew that something big was trying to be pulled off between a small apartment and a basement in South Bend, IN - and we wonder if seeing our intentions would make the fans think we were hacking things up. It’s tempting to drop hints, but if we’re going to effectively hit Cyan up coming out of nowhere, we can’t let the cat out of the bag.

In the end, we’ve moved to using elements of Eneah’s conversation in the sedan as the opening dialog elements of the trailer. “As a child, I often wondered if there were surface dwellers…”

It seems much more appropriate for the story we’re trying to tell.

3:14 am

tags: , , , , , , , , ,

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • Reddit

Mmm, yea, there would’ve been a big hiatus if you guys had dropped hints everywhere. People would’ve gone into a frenzy, and then there would have been a huge fallout when Uru went under. People would have dismissed the idea as a way for Cyan to get money, rather than how it is now a dream that’s coming to fruition. Very nice job being sneaky, guys :D

BTW, are you two intending on having a Viral campaign for this movie? I think it would be a bloody brilliant idea, seeing as how you did with the original flash animation. I’m sure a bunch of us would contribute to making this happen too. Sites like the DRC site and such could have hints and clips dropped in ways that people watching the movie would understand it :D



A shame you had to cut that line; I felt that it did have some resonance and helped to tie things together, especially in that it tied the Book of Ti’ana to the Book of Atrus (which, if you do a film of BoA - oh, do I hope).

Meh. I’m still a little iffy on some of these changes and I am hoping that you’re not turning it into a hollywood action… thingy. I understand that you must appeal to the masses here, but it must remain Myst in the end.

… I am not coherent today. Sorry. You have given us many shinies and it is affecting my thought process.



A shame you had to cut that line It remains in the script, it was only cut in the animatic. I am hoping that you’re not turning it into a hollywood action… thingy. Adrian and I have spent the last several years trying to balance this story between something that will grab the attention of fans, deep-thinking movie goers, and the masses alike. To stay too true to the book would end this attempt as the novel as its own entity does not have what would be required for the screen. What’s nice to know is that Rand has already passively-approved many changes that contradict the novel and portions of established canon directly. We unfortunately have to address everything as a endeavor capable of generating a profit, while remaining a viable, respectable story.



AndyBlooShoes
Jun 24 2008

Glad you haven’t cut it out entirely :)


Watch Post Comments via RSS 2.0